 |
|
| Originally posted on Monday, April 12, 2004. |
|
| Ok, this is what you can consider way late in terms of posting. But in retrospect, this could give me
a good chance to really analyze what happened with the bracketing and the tournament, so here goes. |
| |
| As usual, the MRI was quite close in its prediction of the at large bids, however, it was not as good this
year as it was last year. The cutoff according to the MRI should have been a rank of 49. This means that a team with an MRI rank of
49 or higher should have been expected to make the tournament. This year, we missed 6 teams. The teams that the MRI predicted to go to
the tournament and that didn't were Utah State, Florida State, Troy State, Boston University, Wichita State, and Nebraska. Of these teams,
everyone was selected for the NIT tournament. The 6 teams that the MRI did not pick were Richmond, Michigan State, Washington, DePaul,
Dayton, and Air Force. As in years past, the outlook for those teams going into the tournament should not have been very bright. In
previous years, those teams which the MRI did not select to the tournament failed to get to the Sweet 16 in every case but one. Those
teams even making the second round were rare as many of them came as the result of facing one of the other non-selected teams in the
first round. This year played out no different. The committee stuck me with another match-up of two non-selected teams which necessitated
one of the teams winning. This year, the lucky winner was Depaul, in what was probably the sloppiest first round game of the tournament.
Anyone watching the first round match-up between Depaul and Dayton could see that they did not deserve to be in the tournament, even
facing each other. Depaul, true to form, lost the second round game to the eventual champion Connecticut. Usually the teams which I
pick to make the tournament, and do not actually make it, fair pretty well in the NIT. This year was a little exception to that rule.
The furthest advancement was by Florida State which lost late in the tournament to Iowa State. Michigan, which was an MRI pick until
the last week of the season, breezed through almost every game it played in the NIT to a big win for their program. With a team that
performed as well as it did this year, combined with the fact that almost all their main players will be returning, it looks like Michigan
may soon become a force in the Big Ten once again. |
| |
| The MRI was correct in its prediction of 3 of the 4 Final Four teams, but its one miss was a big one as the
team from that bracket, Georgia Tech ended up going to the final, a prediction that was made from Gonzaga in that region. For the final
game, the MRI made the prediction of Duke to prevail before the tournament in a straight up analysis. Running the MRI through a simulation
proved to make Connecticut the champion based on the starting conditions and the selection criteria. So, the MRI was half right this year
in its choice. |
| |
| One new record this year. Arkansas-Pine Bluff regains its mark as the worst team ever with a new low water
mark of -168.27, beating Savannah State mark of -140.24 back in the 2001-2002 season. Arkansas-Pine Bluff was the worst team in 14 of
the 15 weeks that the MRI reported standings this year. |
| |
| And Now the Rankings |
| |
| RANK | TEAM |
RECORD | MRI | LW | |
| 1 | Duke |
27-5 | 200.16 | 1 | |
| 2 | Connecticut |
27-6 | 190.10 | 2 | |
| 3 | Gonzaga |
27-2 | 177.81 | 3 | |
| 4 | Cincinnati |
24-6 | 176.31 | 4 | |
| 5 | Pittsburgh |
28-4 | 164.86 | 5 | |
| 6 | Oklahoma State |
26-3 | 163.28 | 8 | |
| 7 | Wisconsin |
23-6 | 156.06 | 10 | |
| 8 | Kentucky |
26-4 | 154.87 | 13 | |
| 9 | St. Joseph's |
27-1 | 152.52 | 6 | |
| 10 | Stanford |
29-1 | 149.23 | 12 | |
| 11 | Mississippi State |
25-3 | 148.76 | 7 | |
| 12 | Texas |
23-7 | 147.48 | 9 | |
| 13 | Western Michigan |
26-4 | 146.66 | 15 | |
| 14 | Louisville |
20-9 | 142.71 | 11 | |
| 15 | Georgia Tech |
23-9 | 136.57 | 14 | |
| 16 | Nevada |
22-8 | 135.25 | 17 | |
| 17 | Vanderbilt |
21-9 | 126.41 | 19 | |
| 18 | Illinois |
24-6 | 125.22 | 18 | |
| 19 | North Carolina |
18-10 | 125.19 | 16 | |
| 20 | Xavier |
23-10 | 121.46 | NR(42) | |
| 21 | Murray State |
25-5 | 120.95 | 21 | |
| 22 | Arizona |
20-9 | 118.99 | 20 | |
| 23 | Utah State |
24-3 | 115.74 | 25 | |
| 24 | North Carolina State |
20-9 | 115.42 | NR(26) | |
| 25 | Seton Hall |
19-9 | 115.31 | 22 | |
| |
| Teams Dropped From The Top 25: |
| Wake Forest (LW #23, TW #26), Memphis (LW #24, TW #30) |
| |
| Other Teams People Might Care About |
| |
| RANK | TEAM |
RECORD | MRI | LW | |
| 27 | Florida |
20-10 | 114.17 | 31 | |
| 28 | Texas Tech |
22-10 | 113.07 | 28 | |
| 29 | Kansas |
20-8 | 113.04 | 32 | |
| 37 | Maryland |
19-11 | 102.76 | 38 | |
| 46 | Florida State |
17-13 | 90.72 | 41 | |
| 53 | Michigan |
18-11 | 87.04 | 52 | |
| 54 | Michigan State |
18-11 | 85.12 | 60 | |
| 59 | Dayton |
24-8 | 83.09 | 62 | |
| 80 | Pennsylvania |
17-10 | 69.66 | 77 | |
| 81 | Purdue |
17-13 | 68.92 | 74 | |
| 85 | Notre Dame |
17-12 | 66.13 | 83 | |
| 90 | Drexel |
18-10 | 63.99 | 91 | |
| 96 | Iowa |
16-12 | 61.50 | 90 | |
| 133 | Miami |
13-16 | 39.61 | 135 | |
| 149 | Indiana |
14-15 | 33.47 | 155 | |
| 153 | Ball State |
13-15 | 32.21 | 156 | |
| 199 | UCLA |
11-17 | 13.95 | 192 | |
| 302 | Wofford |
6-20 | -52.01 | 302 | |
| |
| Last Place this week: Arkansas-Pine Bluff (1-26) at -168.27. 14th Week in a row. |
| |
| Biggest Gain this week: Xavier gained 28.64 points (Beat St. Bonaventure, St. Joseph's, George Washington, and Dayton) |
| Biggest Loss this week: Sam Houston lost 7.99 points (Lost to Stephen Austin) |
| |
| Conference rankings this week: ACC, SEC, Big 12, Big East, C-USA, Big Ten, Mountain West, Pac 10, WAC, Atlantic 10, MVC, WCC |
| |
| Enjoy |
|
| Return to 2003-2004 Archive | Return to MRISports.com |
|
| Copyright 2004 MRISports.com |